American ISPs to launch massive copyright spying scheme on July 1

Topics:  ♦ 

If you download potentially copyrighted software, videos or music, your Internet service provider (ISP) has been watching, and they’re coming for you.

Specifically, they’re coming for you on Thursday, July 1.

That’s the date when the nation’s largest ISPs will all voluntarily implement a new anti-piracy plan that will engage network operators in the largest digital spying scheme in history, and see some users’ bandwidth completely cut off until they sign an agreement saying they will not download copyrighted materials.

Word of the start date has been largely kept secret since ISPs announced their plans last June. The deal was brokered by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), and coordinated by the Obama Administration. The same groups have weighed in heavily on controversial Internet policiesaround the world, with similar facilitation by the Obama’s Administration’s State Department.

The July 1 date was revealed by the RIAA’s CEO and top lobbyist, Cary Sherman, during a publishers’ conference on Wednesday in New York, according to technology publication CNet.

The content industries calls this scheme a “graduated response” plan, which will see Time Warner Cable, Cablevision, Comcast, Verizon, AT&T and others spying on users’ Internet activities and watching for potential copyright infringement. Users who are “caught” infringing on a creator’s protected work can then be interrupted with a notice that piracy is forbidden by law and carries penalties of up to $150,000 per infringement, requiring the user to click through saying they understand the consequences before bandwidth is restored, and they could still be subject to copyright infringement lawsuits.

Participating ISPs have a range of options for dealing with customers who continue to pirate media, at that point: They can require that an alleged repeat offender undergo an educational course before their service is restored. They can utilize multiple warnings, restrict access to only certain major websites like Google, Facebook or a list of the top 200 sites going, reduce someone’s bandwidth to practically nothing and even share information on repeat offenders with competing ISPs, effectively creating a sort of Internet blacklist — although publicly, none of the network operators have agreed to “terminate” a customer’s service.

It is because of those reasons that the content industries believe this program achieves much more than what might have been possible in the realm of public policy, and the ISPs appear to agree. The voluntary scheme will be paid for mostly by the content industries, which will share some costs with the ISPs.

Not everyone sees it as a positive: The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights advocacy group, argued that the “graduated response” scheme lacks transparency, and that copyright holders could wield the network operators like a blunt instrument in cases where their claims may not be entirely valid — which is the biggest problem with statutes codified by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. They also pressed for assurances that claim reviews will be conducted by a neutral party, and suggested that users should be given some form of due process before their bandwidth is turned down or cut off entirely.

The EFF also took issue with the system of protest the program puts in place, which only gives users six predetermined “defenses” against a copyright claim. “And even the six enumerated defenses are incomplete,” they complained. “For example, the ‘public domain’ defense applies only if the work was created before 1923 — even though works created after 1923 can enter the public domain in a variety of ways.”

A legislative effort that would have achieved some, but not all, of these ends was utterly destroyed by the Internet’s first ever mass work stoppage late last year, which saw thousands of popular websites go dark in protest. (Disclosure: The Raw Story participated in that protest.)

It’s not yet clear how the tech world will react to the ISPs siding with the content industries to do what the government simply could not.

Views: 183


You need to be a member of United Truth Seekers to add comments!

Join United Truth Seekers

Comment by Colonel Robert F. Cunningham on June 27, 2012 at 11:34pm


You're absolutely right!  The money that IS collected isn't distributed in accordance with the music-that-is-actually used's authors, composers and publishers ... but to the KAK-Clique.  Period.

As a songwriter, publisher, artist, et cetera, myself, I could care less about somebody hearing my music for FREE because if they LIKE it enough they'll come to my PERFORMANCES where the money is anyway.

Try to get THAT through to a bunch of KAKs ....

Comment by Kerry Hay on June 27, 2012 at 9:39pm

Why not create another free network that will allow Internet users legal access of material without liability? We can understand why illegal piracy is hurting the music and movie making industry worldwide, but there should not be a total ban on very old copyrighted material more than twenty years old. The Internet really should not have people dictating restrictive policy changes without realizing the consequences. We can see the future of the free internet going belly-up, the general public should cancel their internet provider until this matter is resolved with a view to realistic freedom for all who pay through the nose each month to connect to the internet without fear of big brother breathing down our necks in order to protect large corporations profits at the expense of freedom and liberty for all who use the Internet.        

Comment by Colonel Robert F. Cunningham on June 26, 2012 at 3:26pm

This is but one more layer of KAK-Scam practiced by the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP), Broadcast Music, Incorporated (BMI) and SESAC (which according to those liars stands for SESAC) that has robbed their respective NON-CLIQUE 'membership' for as long as all three have been in existence.

 The full story is posted at -- -- just follow the links.  It names the names and spells out the scams in no uncertain terms.

The site has been up almost since Al Gore 'invented' the net, and hasn't even been threatened by any of the lying, thieving bastards, including the United States District Court, Southern District of New York:  their co-conspirators and co-thieves - with either defamation or libel - because we have the TRUTH fully documented and all those filthy bastards know it!  In case you're interested, TRUTH is a perfect defense against both defamation and libel ...

I, Colonel Robert F. Cunningham, and I alone am responsible for any and all commentary in my reply.

Help Pay The Rent. "United Truth Seekers" Is an informative Social Network exposing the truth that the mainstream media ignores. The truth will set you free!

This website is brought to you exclusively by member donations. Click Above, Thank you.

Eastern Standard Time






"It was the poverty caused by the bad influence of the
 English Bankers on the Parliament which has caused in the colonies hatred of the English and...the Revolutionary War."
– Benjamin Franklin

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined."

Patrick Henry
June 26, 1788


© 2019   Created by Pam Vredenburg.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

google-site-verification: google4dc7c778a884c7b9.html